The Great deception, part 4

Electoral fraud and fraudulent elections

Anyone but the Tories, Make America Great Again - Basically these were the two rallying cries of the 2024 elections in the UK and USA respectively.

Both successful campaigns were fought around a message of ‘change is needed’.

In the UK the Labour Party promised that a vote for them was a vote for change, in the US Donald Trump portrayed himself as the guy who was going to shake up Capitol Hill and improve the lives of everyday Americans.

Both were powerful messages and certainly appealed to the electorate of both countries who had become increasingly disillusioned and angry at what they perceived to be the increasing failure of the ruling parties, Conservative and Democrat, to understand the frustrations and concerns of ‘ordinary people’.

Interestingly both Keir Starmer’s Labour party and Donald Trump’s Republicans gained landslide victories whilst, on the surface at least, standing at diametrically opposite ends of the political spectrum. Labour were traditionally ‘left-wing’ whereas the Republicans are seen as being ‘right wing’. 

This article will show that in modern, MIlitarised Industrial Complex funded politics, there is no such thing as left or right wing government. Why? Because no matter what politicians promise, they are employees of the state. Temporary employees at that and for the state to allow then to wield actual power would be like allowing a substitute teacher to set a school’s curriculum. 

It’s not going to happen.

What about the state itself? A state is defined as ‘an autonomous political unit holding centralised power over the many different groups within its territory. In order for a country to be considered a state it must be sovereign, meaning that it is self governing and holds supreme power.

This power includes the right to define the electoral process, to hold and adjudicate on elections. In a democracy the state should be subject to the rule of law. The court system should have the ability to control the worst urges of the most powerful people in Government.

Let's look more closely at the key areas of dissatisfaction within the electorate of both countries prior to the elections, what about the Conservative and Democrat governments behaviour and track record caused them to suffer such crushing defeats.

In the UK the issues were glaringly obvious. The results of a YouGov survey published on June the 1st, just over a month before the country went to the polls on July the 4th, clearly showed that the three most important issues on the minds of British voters were;

1. The cost of Living

2. Health

3. The economy in general. 

In the US the 3 top issues across all voters  according to a survey published by the Pew Research Centre on September the 9th, prior to the election on November the 5th were:

1. The Economy

2. Healthcare

3. Supreme Court Appointments

In both the UK and the US the economy and healthcare were the two most important issues food the electorate.

It's interesting that Immigration and Asylum wasn't in the top three in either country, yet that's pretty much all mainstream media focussed on.

In both countries the successful candidate successfully picked up on the sentiment that ordinary, working class people were sick and tired of feeling betrayed by governments that they no longer trusted.

The democrats were seen as focussing on the middle class and upwards whereas in the UK the Conservative party had  become a laughing stock, with PM after PM being forced out as the party came to be perceived as more right wing and more elitist than ever.

Basically voters in both the UK and the US demanded change. They were sick and tired of watching the rich get richer while the majority became poorer under governments increasingly out of touch with the reality of life for millions.

So they voted for change. Or so they thought.

Let's examine what that change actually looks like.

In part one I touched briefly on the idea that the Labour Party is so far removed from traditional labour values that it can hardly call itself Labour. The red tories seems a more appropriate name! The term same arse different cheek is trending for a reason.

Since coming to power, Labour's popularity has plummeted as they have reneged on many of their manifesto pledges from calling for an end to the occupation of the west bank to scrapping pledges made regarding climate, changing the rules around fiscal borrowing and strengthening protection for workers.

Basically they came to power and, rightly or wrongly, claimed  that there isn't enough money to implement many of the 2019 manifesto pledges. 

Indeed things are so bad that they changed the rules around government borrowing to enable them to increase the level of debt the country is in. Another manifesto pledge fudged at best.

What did they do with the new found freedom to borrow?

Black Rock.

One of the biggest players in the Militarised Industrial Complex have been asked to fund the £58tn (yes 58 trillion pounds) necessary to fund housing, healthcare and energy in the UK between now and 2024.

That loan will never be paid off. BlackRock owns the UK.

Lock stock and smoking barrel.

So you see, if you think you voted for change when you voted Labour think again.

You voted to place the UK in the hands of the Military Industrial Complex.

If you think that voting for the Reform party next time round will make the slightest bit of difference, you are delusional. UK government policy is now firmly in the hands of the 1% and do  you really think that Nigel Farage will turn against his public school chums?

The election was a fraud. Just as Keir Starmer and his red tories did away with free speech in the wake of the 2024 riots, they have now sold the UKs democracy.

Democracy only works if you have a choice. The UK has no choice, the front men may change, the employees of the MIC may come and go but as has been the case in the US for years now, politicians are nothing more than the MICs entertainment division.

Temporary employees and woe betide anyone who tries to stand up to them. It's easy to fake anything nowadays, from an incriminating phone call to a skiing accident.

Besides, the MIC already owns Mainstream Media. Look how Jeremey Corben was portrayed as an anti semitic old man by the BBC, SKY and the rest of the puppet media. 

Interestingly Corben received a bigger share of the vote than Keir Starmer's landslide winning government did. 

Does that sound like a free and fair election to you?

Let's look at the US election. In part 1 of this series I showed how Donald Trump is already an employee of the MIC.

The details are astounding and frightening. The MIC owns Donald Trump.

Apart from the fact that Deutsche Bank's biggest institutional investors are BlackRock, both then and Vanguard have recently bought up massive amounts of shares in the President's companies.  Trump's biggest single investor is Timothy Mellon, heir to the Mellon Banking family fortune. The crown jewel of the Mellon family if the New York Bank and their biggest investors include State Street, Vanguard and, you guessed it, BlackRock

If the American electorate thought they were voting for change, for a rebel, for anything other than an employee of the MIC, they too, were sadly mistaken.

Worse than that, they were lied to, defrauded.

Just take a look at how Trump’s picks for high office have been eliminated before the senate was even asked to approve them.

The President has limited, if any power.

It's clear when you follow the money trail and believe me, it's not easy, that the United Kingdom and the United States of America have been bought and sold down the river.

The public does not have a choice. We have a huge choice of things to buy of course, the MIC want their dividends after all!  Already the new UK government is speaking about the need to deregulate the industrial and financial sector.

Today Rachael Reeves stated that concerns for the environment could not be allowed to prevent the building of 150 new houses in the UK.

Most industry analysts see this figure as a pipe dream. How long before the housebuilders receive their down payments though?

How many major UK projects have been shelved after billions of pounds have already  been paid.

So far in this series we have seen how the idea that either the UK or the US voted for candidates who could or even planned to change  the countries for the benefit of the electorate.

We have analysed the 1% and the Militarised Industrial Complex and seen that in reality, the former created the latter.

Now we have seen how, via the financial might of the MIC, the 1% have bought 2 of the biggest democracies on the planet.

In the 5th and final article in this series I will show how the MIC uses various secretive organisations to spread their influence and  demonstrate that moral and ethical behaviours have no impact on whether countries join the club’ or not. All that matters is that they join the club. Once they're in, they can act with impunity, regardless of how many crimes against humanity they commit.

We will look at the actions and words of members of groups such as Bilderberg and The Family and ask the question, what is their endgame and how does it impact the future and very survival of the human race as we know it.